Toeknee - Thanks. The TADJ option looks useful. I will have to give it a try.
I have used the Canadian (CSRS) to get a solution. Like you I would like to use OPUS. Using Emlid Studio I have had much better luck. When I do get a solution using the RTKConv file there is less error in the solution from Emlid Studio generated file than the RTKConv generated file.
Thanks for all your suggestions, Eaton99.
Eaton 99:
When I do get a solution using the RTKConv file there is less error in the solution from Emlid Studio generated file than the RTKConv generated file.
Interesting. So perhaps Emlid either (a) improved the RTKLIB code or (b) figured out the optimum configuration parameters for RTKCONV.
I would have a slight preference to use RTKCONV if everything else was equal, mostly so I could script the conversion process. But I’ve settled on Emlid Studio for now.
toeknee, It might be a bit of both, improved code and optimum configuration. It is interesting to note that while looking at the link for the TADJ option I noticed that under the MULTICODE option there is mention of the “Emlid version of RTKLIB code”. So, it looks like the author of RTKCONV is aware of the Emlid code.
I would also like to use RTKCONV. When I load the ubx file into RTKPLOT, I can see the data plotted. It shows why you would not want to use the first 5 minutes or so of data. I do not know how to get the Emlid software to do this. After the Emlid software converts the ubx file to RINEX it shows a graph, but I am not sure how to interpret that to know whether my data is any good or not.
Thanks,