Hi. I’m keen to try 0.2.0 to see if I can get a bit more speed. I can build 0.2.0 with libftdi v0.16 no problems. But building using the non-free binary driver has problems. Configuring using:
./configure --enable-ft2232_ftd2xx --enable-ftd2xx-highspeed --with-ftd2xx-linux-tardir=/home/proze/opt/openocd/libftd2xx0.4.16/
is fine. Building works fine until the very last linking step, when it fails with:
gcc -std=gnu99 -g -O2 -I/home/proze/opt/openocd/libftd2xx0.4.16 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wformat-security -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wbad-function-cast -Wcast-align -Wredundant-decls -Werror -o openocd main.o /home/proze/opt/openocd/libftd2xx0.4.16/static_lib/libftd2xx.a.0.4.16 ./.libs/libopenocd.a -ldl -lpthread
./.libs/libopenocd.a(ft2232.o): In function `ft2232_quit’:
/home/proze/opt/openocd/openocd-0.2.0/src/jtag/ft2232.c:2773: undefined reference to `FT_Close’
./.libs/libopenocd.a(ft2232.o): In function `ft2232_write’:
/home/proze/opt/openocd/openocd-0.2.0/src/jtag/ft2232.c:347: undefined reference to `FT_Write’
./.libs/libopenocd.a(ft2232.o): In function `ft2232_init_ftd2xx’:
/home/proze/opt/openocd/openocd-0.2.0/src/jtag/ft2232.c:1809: undefined reference to `FT_SetVIDPID’
/home/proze/opt/openocd/openocd-0.2.0/src/jtag/ft2232.c:1839: undefined reference to `FT_OpenEx’
/home/proze/opt/openocd/openocd-0.2.0/src/jtag/ft2232.c:1903: undefined reference to `FT_SetLatencyTimer’
/home/proze/opt/openocd/openocd-0.2.0/src/jtag/ft2232.c:1909: undefined reference to `FT_GetLatencyTimer’
/home/proze/opt/openocd/openocd-0.2.0/src/jtag/ft2232.c:1919: undefined reference to `FT_SetTimeouts’
/home/proze/opt/openocd/openocd-0.2.0/src/jtag/ft2232.c:1925: undefined reference to `FT_SetBitMode’
/home/proze/opt/openocd/openocd-0.2.0/src/jtag/ft2232.c:1931: undefined reference to `FT_GetDeviceInfo’
/home/proze/opt/openocd/openocd-0.2.0/src/jtag/ft2232.c:1871: undefined reference to `FT_ListDevices’
/home/proze/opt/openocd/openocd-0.2.0/src/jtag/ft2232.c:1882: undefined reference to `FT_ListDevices’
/home/proze/opt/openocd/openocd-0.2.0/src/jtag/ft2232.c:1847: undefined reference to `FT_OpenEx’
./.libs/libopenocd.a(ft2232.o): In function `ft2232_purge_ftd2xx’:
/home/proze/opt/openocd/openocd-0.2.0/src/jtag/ft2232.c:1960: undefined reference to `FT_Purge’
./.libs/libopenocd.a(ft2232.o): In function `ft2232_read’:
/home/proze/opt/openocd/openocd-0.2.0/src/jtag/ft2232.c:385: undefined reference to `FT_Read’
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[3]: *** [openocd] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/proze/opt/openocd/openocd-0.2.0/src’
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/proze/opt/openocd/openocd-0.2.0/src’
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/proze/opt/openocd/openocd-0.2.0’
make: *** [all] Error 2
However, if I change the linking step to:
gcc -std=gnu99 -g -O2 -I/home/proze/opt/openocd/libftd2xx0.4.16 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wformat-security -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wbad-function-cast -Wcast-align -Wredundant-decls -Werror -o openocd main.o ./.libs/libopenocd.a /home/proze/opt/openocd/libftd2xx0.4.16/static_lib/libftd2xx.a.0.4.16 -ldl -lpthread
and run it in the src folder it links correctly and produces the openocd binary.
I don’t know why the order of the object files makes a difference? Someone please enlighten me?
