On factor is the choice of frequency bands and the host nation’s power limitations for that band. In the US, the 315/433MHz band where most remotes and wireless thermometers are have very low power limits and low duty cycle rules.
In 902-928MHz, one can use a lot higher power. And frequency hop to avoid interference.
And have a larger battery size for this class of device.
Next is the issue of transmitted signal occupied channel bandwidth and bit rate. Smaller bandwidth and/or lower bit rate = less required signal to noise to receive at some error rate. And forward error correction codes (effectively reducing the useful bit rate) allow for weaker signals.
I was thinking of using products by Linx Wireless. I bought the demo kit for the LR series radios @ 418MHz and had ‘alright success’ … not all that great IMO
Would moving to something like the ES series @ 916MHz help me get more range?
clifford describes sst as " Range is important, and Clifford is proud to offer the longest range remotes in our history - up to a full mile using Digital Spread Spectrum Technology (SST). SST uses digital frequency hopping and multiple frequency transmission to assure that, if a frequency is blocked, the signal still goes through.
One Mile Range based on line of sight, unobstructed testing in ideal conditions. Actual range will vary due to local conditions including but not limited to environment, terrain, physical obstructions, vehicle location and orientation, interference and other possible impediments. "
what’s it say on the back of your coworker’s remote for FCC info?