the next application is related to the previous post.
i also have tons of experience with this.
its making a manchurian candidate.
im sure some of you have read the book and maybe seen the movie “manchurian candidate”…
its every psychologists dream to do this apparantly…
experimental psychology and electronics collide.
it involves using external and internal auditory stimuluses and switching back and forth between the 2 of them. the point is to dull the auditory senses so the person will accept the inside auditory stimulus as their own.
it is imperative to have good coverage and you must say things related to what the person is doing… so you need very good TRV (technical remote viewing) capability.
people in intelligence love to play with these toys… (yah they are toys cause you have to be a kid to sit there and use them…)…
but as lots of you know me, i am an analytical person… sometimes like a computer.
if a brick hit me in the head, i would analyze the events and the subhematoma or concussion that may result… thats just how i am.
thus is my own experience to these events that i analyze and my analysis is this:
-
you cannot create a true manchurian candidate with the tech mentioned here if the target is not drugged and under hallucinagens.
-
you may have limited effect in behavioral programming through sleep methods previously described.
-
it takes YEARS to do this (without hallucinagens)… years of constant 24 hour stimulation both internal and external.
-
in the near future, it will be possible to create a manchurian candidate using new tech and no hallucinagens no drugs…!!! its true… we need new laws governing the use of these electronics, and the use of psychology.
-
the exposure to this in the long term (4 years with my data) produces extreme short term memory loss, nervous system damage and some other effects associated to psychosematic and the actual sleeplessness etc of the occuring events.
But with all the stuff the military and its associates are doing right now, there needs to be civilian oversight of ALL experimental psychological operations being conducted in the US. simply becuase they do represent a danger to national security.
i recommend this oversight falls to the Department of Homeland Security as they are well equipped for this regulatory fashion.
also to expand on the tech previously mentioned… it IS possible to create a computer tomography automated system to make sound appear in an XYZ coordinate system given smaller node audio elements using the acoustic heterodyne method above. The area should be mapped out, have visual oversight everywhere, audio mic everywhere for noise analysis, and 24 hour operations being manned and plotted on the “event” board.
It is also possible to use the similiar ultrasonic force devices in tandem with the acoustic heterodyne methods to produce a “3d entity” so to speak… such as a bee buzzing in front of you that has audio but also has the feel of movement…
This tech method will effect the “psychological playground” to be used to make a manchurian candidate.
This tech also brings up tons of morality and ethical issues that need to be addressed.
Also tech wise, what FCC rules cover the emmissions of these devices?
what do we do for victims? what legal action can be taken against the perps.
You could set up a spectrum analyzer in site scanner mode with GPIB and a computer for 24 hour monitoring, i think this is a great method for FCC enforement.
and we all can get a head start on whats coming up.