Great Product Documentation, but I need some guidance.
The PostCard is so small, it’s natural to start thinking of its use in space-constrained applications.
The snag I’m having is the SMA connector obviously demands that the coax leaves the board in this direction but it also requires a decent amount of space outside the boards footprint before redirecting the antenna cable/coax towards the antenna location.
The Hardware Overview mentions:
While there are two GNSS antenna connectors, only the SMA connector is connected to the LG290P GNSS module by default. If users wish, they can rework the 402 resistor on the antenna trace to utilize the u.fl connector instead.
The Schematic shows:
The 3D Model:
Questions:
- Is the reference to " the 402 resistor" indeed what I’m looking at on the 3D model (the unpopulated pads), and R20 on the schematic ?
- If R20 was populated in the future, could anyone use Either antenna connector ?
- Given the nature, sensitivity, etc, of an RTK product like this - would the tiny coax used in most u.fl be limiting in this application (in regards to signal strength, noise, etc,) ? IE: should I forget about using u.fl ?
My scanning electron microscope is “in-the-shop”, so I personally wont be reworking that surface mount resistor anyway
Thanks in Advance,
Ryan